Comments on: Oh, baby, C++ is dead (at least in MS Learning) http://khason.net/blog/oh-baby-c-is-dead-at-least-in-ms-learning/ Take care of the sense, and the sounds will take care of themselves. Fri, 18 May 2012 08:56:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Gdxebbot http://khason.net/blog/oh-baby-c-is-dead-at-least-in-ms-learning/comment-page-1/#comment-2995 Gdxebbot Thu, 07 May 2009 19:15:53 +0000 http://khason.net/blog/oh-baby-c-is-dead-at-least-in-ms-learning/#comment-2995 OjBviZ comment4 , OjBviZ comment4 ,

]]> By: Alex Cohn http://khason.net/blog/oh-baby-c-is-dead-at-least-in-ms-learning/comment-page-1/#comment-1137 Alex Cohn Thu, 01 Jan 2009 08:37:24 +0000 http://khason.net/blog/oh-baby-c-is-dead-at-least-in-ms-learning/#comment-1137 <p>For anyone who exeprienced the switch from 2003 version of managed C++ to 2005 version, this epythaph was on the wall. Also, for anyone who tried to actually port legacy C++ code to managed (has there ever been another justification for managed C++ with its ^ gcnew obscure syntax)?</p> <p>As far as native is concerned, it's funny you discard this realm as not relevant. Note that many products are still developed in C becasue C++ is not considered efficient enough.</p> For anyone who exeprienced the switch from 2003 version of managed C++ to 2005 version, this epythaph was on the wall. Also, for anyone who tried to actually port legacy C++ code to managed (has there ever been another justification for managed C++ with its ^ gcnew obscure syntax)?

As far as native is concerned, it's funny you discard this realm as not relevant. Note that many products are still developed in C becasue C++ is not considered efficient enough.

]]>